Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Much stimulus rightly goes toward long-term societal needs

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:59, 12 February 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 03:32, 12 February 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Argument: Much stimulus rightly goes toward good social projects moved to Argument: Much stimulus rightly goes toward long-term societal needs)
Next diff →

Revision as of 03:32, 12 February 2009

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Paul Krugman. "The Destructive Center". The New York Times. February 9, 2009 - the centrists did their best to make the plan weaker and worse.

One of the best features of the original plan was aid to cash-strapped state governments, which would have provided a quick boost to the economy while preserving essential services. But the centrists insisted on a $40 billion cut in that spending.

The original plan also included badly needed spending on school construction; $16 billion of that spending was cut. It included aid to the unemployed, especially help in maintaining health care -- cut. Food stamps -- cut. All in all, more than $80 billion was cut from the plan, with the great bulk of those cuts falling on precisely the measures that would do the most to reduce the depth and pain of this slump.


Barack Obama. "We Can't Afford to Wait". February 9, 2009 - The plan will save or create three to four million jobs over the next two years. But not just any jobs - jobs that meet the needs we've neglected for far too long and lay the groundwork for long-term economic growth: jobs fixing our schools; computerizing medical records to save costs and save lives; repairing our infrastructure; and investing in renewable energy to help us move toward energy independence. The plan also calls for immediate tax relief for 95 percent of American workers.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.