Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Israeli attacks in Gaza undermine peace process, long-term security

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:23, 8 January 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 19:23, 8 January 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate: Israeli attacks on Gaza]]+*[[Debate: Israeli invasion of Gaza]]
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==

Revision as of 19:23, 8 January 2009

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Nicholas Kristoff. "The Gaza Boomerang". New York Times. January 7, 2009 - We all know that the most plausible solution to the Middle East mess is a two-state solution along the lines that former President Bill Clinton has proposed. It’s difficult to tell how we get there from here, but a crucial step is to strengthen President Mahmoud Abbas and his Palestinian Authority.

Instead, initial reports are that the assault on Gaza is focusing Arab anger on Mr. Abbas and moderate neighbors like Jordan, undermining the peacemakers.

My courageous Times colleague in Gaza, Taghreed el-Khodary, quoted a 37-year-old father weeping over the corpse of his 11-year-old daughter: “From now on, I am Hamas. I choose resistance.”

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.