Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Israel can fully deter and defend against Iran

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 14:15, 22 October 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:50, 9 March 2012 (edit)
Myclob (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
[http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/11/opposing-view-i.html Joshua Muravchik. "Opposing View: Iranian Bomb 'Intolerable'". USA Today. November 20, 2007]: "Israel, with its conventional arms and weapons of mass destruction, is amply capable of assuring its own military deterrence and defence, whatever Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, thinks or says." [http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/11/opposing-view-i.html Joshua Muravchik. "Opposing View: Iranian Bomb 'Intolerable'". USA Today. November 20, 2007]: "Israel, with its conventional arms and weapons of mass destruction, is amply capable of assuring its own military deterrence and defence, whatever Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, thinks or says."
 +
 +==Opposing arguments==
 +# Israel is not very big. One nuclear weapon could destroy much of the population

Revision as of 16:50, 9 March 2012

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Joshua Muravchik. "Opposing View: Iranian Bomb 'Intolerable'". USA Today. November 20, 2007: "Israel, with its conventional arms and weapons of mass destruction, is amply capable of assuring its own military deterrence and defence, whatever Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, thinks or says."

Opposing arguments

  1. Israel is not very big. One nuclear weapon could destroy much of the population

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.