Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Iran is more concerned about self-defense than aggression

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:06, 16 April 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:31, 9 March 2012 (edit)
Myclob (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 10: Line 10:
==Counter-argument== ==Counter-argument==
-*[[Argument: A nuclear Iran would be more aggressive in the Middle East]]+# [[Argument: A nuclear Iran would be more aggressive in the Middle East]]
 +#

Revision as of 16:31, 9 March 2012

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

"Analysts: Iran's military poses little threat". USA Today. March 6, 2007 - ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran's outdated military presents little current threat to its neighbors, despite the fierce rhetoric from its hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, military analysts said Monday at a security conference here in the Persian Gulf.

Iran has exaggerated its military capabilities, while U.S. and Israeli leaders have engaged in "provocative rhetoric" that overstates the Iranian threat, said Anthony Cordesman of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In reality, Iran is more focused on national defense than using military power to boost its influence in the region, he said.

Counter-argument

  1. Argument: A nuclear Iran would be more aggressive in the Middle East

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.