Personal tools

Argument: Intelligent design cannot be scientifically tested

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 04:53, 31 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting evidence)
← Previous diff
Current revision (04:53, 31 January 2008) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*+*[[Debate:The science of Intelligent Design theory]]
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

The second part of ID calls for an external Designer. This idea is neither fully supported nor fully falsified by material observation. There is no scientific way to test for the presence or absence of the Designer, as the Designer is defined as unobservable, or at least, only observable by a chosen few."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits