Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Free trade agreements often force countries to privatize public services

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:12, 26 February 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (19:20, 3 May 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Free trade and globalization]]+*[[Debate: Free trade]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*[http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/05/5036/ Adrian Boutureira. "The Hidden Costs of Free Trade". The Boston Globe. November 5, 2007] - "As if that weren’t enough, there’s an unseemly underbelly to the proposed deal that could lock Peru into a privatized social security system similar to the proposal by President Bush that Democrats successfully fought off in the last Congress. The main beneficiary of the provision seems to be Citibank, the largest shareholder in ProFuturo AFP, a company authorized to compete against Peru’s national social security system." *[http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/05/5036/ Adrian Boutureira. "The Hidden Costs of Free Trade". The Boston Globe. November 5, 2007] - "As if that weren’t enough, there’s an unseemly underbelly to the proposed deal that could lock Peru into a privatized social security system similar to the proposal by President Bush that Democrats successfully fought off in the last Congress. The main beneficiary of the provision seems to be Citibank, the largest shareholder in ProFuturo AFP, a company authorized to compete against Peru’s national social security system."

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Adrian Boutureira. "The Hidden Costs of Free Trade". The Boston Globe. November 5, 2007 - "As if that weren’t enough, there’s an unseemly underbelly to the proposed deal that could lock Peru into a privatized social security system similar to the proposal by President Bush that Democrats successfully fought off in the last Congress. The main beneficiary of the provision seems to be Citibank, the largest shareholder in ProFuturo AFP, a company authorized to compete against Peru’s national social security system."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.