Argument: Free market constrains risk-taking by letting banks fail - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Free market constrains risk-taking by letting banks fail From Debatepedia Revision as of 18:17, 27 September 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 [Edit] Supporting quotations " Senate Financial Reform Bill: More Bailouts & Fed Power". The New American. May 2010: "The primary argument for the American Financial Stability Act of 2010 has been that government should stop excessive risk-taking by financial firms. In a free market, firms that take lots of foolish risks go bankrupt and are removed from the economy (thus ending the threat). The threat of bankruptcy offers a strong incentive for prudent business practices." Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Free_market_constrains_risk-taking_by_letting_banks_fail"

Problem with the site?

.