Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Emissions cuts are main focus, adaptation is secondary

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 19:12, 16 February 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Michael A. Levi, David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in a December 11th, 2009 New York Times article: "if the world can’t get emissions under control, the cost of adapting to climate change will surely dwarf the $10 billion that’s now on the table."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.