Personal tools

Argument: Elected judges bring hassle of regulating conflicts of interests

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 22:55, 21 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

"Elect to appoint judges instead". York Daily Record. June 12, 2009: "The high court ruled in a West Virginia case that judges must recuse themselves from cases involving high-dollar donors who helped them win their seats. [...] If Pennsylvania used a merit selection process -- as proposed in recently introduced legislation -- we wouldn't have to worry about running afoul of that ruling and judges wouldn't have to try to figure out whether a $50 donation requires recrusal."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits