Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Elected judge conflicts of interests can be sufficiently regulated

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 22:52, 21 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Adam Liptak. "Looking Anew at Campaign Cash and Elected Judges". New York Times. January 29, 2008: "you do not have to do away with elections and or even fund-raising to make a drastic improvement in the quality of justice in state courts around the nation. All you need to do is listen to Professor Palmer. If a judge has taken money from a litigant or a lawyer, Professor Palmer says, the judge has no business ruling on that person's case."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.