Argument: Consumers can be protected w/o new financial bureaucracy

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Consumers can be protected w/o new financial bureaucracy From Debatepedia Revision as of 16:41, 7 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 [Edit] Supporting quotations "Pros and cons of Obama’s financial reform proposal". By Edward L. Yingling. The Hill. May 2010 "Wherever there are perceived weaknesses in the protection of consumers by regulated depository institutions — banks and credit unions — they should be specifically addressed, but not by the creation of yet another regulatory agency." Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Consumers_can_be_protected_w/o_new_financial_bureaucracy"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate