Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Children do better when raised by biological parents

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 16:25, 6 June 2010 (edit)
Destinero (Talk | contribs)
(propagandistic statement clearly refuted by the all highly reliable expert bodies and peer-reviewed literature)
← Previous diff
Current revision (06:39, 17 October 2010) (edit)
Destinero (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations - This do not support the argument since they compared only heterosexual households with 2 and 1 parent, not same sex households, thus irrational argument)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
-[http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/high-cost-of-tampering-with-marriage-kids-hit-hardest "High Cost of Tampering with Marriage – Kids Hit Hardest." Alliance Defense Fund on OpposingViews.com]: "The state’s interest in recognizing marriage is to ensure that as many children as possible grow up with their own married mom and dad. Every child has a biological mom and dad." 
- 
- 
-[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,2093869.story David Blankenhorn. "Protecting marriage to protect children." LA Times. September 19, 2008]: "Marriage is society's most pro-child institution. In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage." 

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.