Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Children do better when raised by biological parents

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:47, 3 June 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Reverted edits by Destinero (Talk); changed back to last version by Brooks Lindsay)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:25, 6 June 2010 (edit)
Destinero (Talk | contribs)
(propagandistic statement clearly refuted by the all highly reliable expert bodies and peer-reviewed literature)
Next diff →
Line 3: Line 3:
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
-[http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/high-cost-of-tampering-with-marriage-kids-hit-hardest "High Cost of Tampering with Marriage – Kids Hit Hardest." Alliance Defense Fund on OpposingViews.com]: "The state’s interest in recognizing marriage is to ensure that as many children as possible grow up with their own married mom and dad. Every child has a biological mom and dad. The nonpartisan social science research is overwhelmingly conclusive. All other things being equal, children generally do far better, by every measure, when raised by their own married parents."+[http://www.opposingviews.com/arguments/high-cost-of-tampering-with-marriage-kids-hit-hardest "High Cost of Tampering with Marriage – Kids Hit Hardest." Alliance Defense Fund on OpposingViews.com]: "The state’s interest in recognizing marriage is to ensure that as many children as possible grow up with their own married mom and dad. Every child has a biological mom and dad."
-[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,2093869.story David Blankenhorn. "Protecting marriage to protect children." LA Times. September 19, 2008]: "Marriage is society's most pro-child institution. In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage." +[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-blankenhorn19-2008sep19,0,2093869.story David Blankenhorn. "Protecting marriage to protect children." LA Times. September 19, 2008]: "Marriage is society's most pro-child institution. In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage."
- +
-All our scholarly instruments seem to agree: For healthy development, what a child needs more than anything else is the mother and father who together made the child, who love the child and love each other."+

Revision as of 16:25, 6 June 2010

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

"High Cost of Tampering with Marriage – Kids Hit Hardest." Alliance Defense Fund on OpposingViews.com: "The state’s interest in recognizing marriage is to ensure that as many children as possible grow up with their own married mom and dad. Every child has a biological mom and dad."


David Blankenhorn. "Protecting marriage to protect children." LA Times. September 19, 2008: "Marriage is society's most pro-child institution. In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.