Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Carbon taxes are economically costly

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:28, 11 June 2010 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debates)
← Previous diff
Current revision (17:12, 16 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debates)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debates== ==Parent debates==
-*[[Debate:Carbon tax]]+*[[Debate: Carbon tax]]
*[[Debate: Cap-and-trade versus carbon tax]] *[[Debate: Cap-and-trade versus carbon tax]]
== Supporting quotations == == Supporting quotations ==
[http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21170497-27650,00.html "Carbon tax to hit miners", The Australian, 2/5/07] - "A $25 per tonne carbon tax would cost the state's alumina industry more than $200 million a year."[http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21170497-27650,00.html] [http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21170497-27650,00.html "Carbon tax to hit miners", The Australian, 2/5/07] - "A $25 per tonne carbon tax would cost the state's alumina industry more than $200 million a year."[http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21170497-27650,00.html]

Current revision

Parent debates

Supporting quotations

"Carbon tax to hit miners", The Australian, 2/5/07 - "A $25 per tonne carbon tax would cost the state's alumina industry more than $200 million a year."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.