Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Bills in rep democracy pass through beneficial committees

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:53, 19 October 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (21:54, 19 October 2010) (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate: US health care reform]], con argument.+*[[Debate: Direct democracy]], con argument.
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
[http://books.google.com/books?id=Wmrdq9lpKbYC&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=The+case+against+referendum&source=bl&ots=t-jsXK3Iyp&sig=j8kgsuloxEjr0cd6vKhIS5r2LwY&hl=en&ei=ZBQoS62uB8uXtge-59HZCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=The%20case%20against%20referendum&f=false James Boyle. "The initiative and referendum: its folly, fallacies, and failure." (1912)]: "the advantage of havingureeeived careful scrutiny and the safe guard of having to pass through several Commit tees." [http://books.google.com/books?id=Wmrdq9lpKbYC&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=The+case+against+referendum&source=bl&ots=t-jsXK3Iyp&sig=j8kgsuloxEjr0cd6vKhIS5r2LwY&hl=en&ei=ZBQoS62uB8uXtge-59HZCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=The%20case%20against%20referendum&f=false James Boyle. "The initiative and referendum: its folly, fallacies, and failure." (1912)]: "the advantage of havingureeeived careful scrutiny and the safe guard of having to pass through several Commit tees."

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

James Boyle. "The initiative and referendum: its folly, fallacies, and failure." (1912): "the advantage of havingureeeived careful scrutiny and the safe guard of having to pass through several Commit tees."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.