Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: AIG contracts no different than invalidated auto contracts

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 15:47, 22 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Lynn Sweet. "In case of AIG bonus payments, some contracts made to be broken". Chicago Sun Times. March 16, 2009 - "Why are the contracts with AIG execs more valid than the contracts between the automakers and autoworkers? Congress INSISTED that the autoworkers take pay cuts -- and MODIFY THE CONTRACTS they had negotiated -- before the automakers got federal money? . . . If the federal government owns 80% of AIG, what control do we have over the actions of management?"

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.