Personal tools
 
Views

Critical thinking

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Critical thinking is an mental process of analyzing or evaluating information. Such information may be gathered from observation, experience, reasoning, or communication. Critical thinking has its basis in intellectual values that go beyond subject matter divisions and include: clarity, accuracy, precision, evidence, thoroughness and fairness. In fact, there is an important difference between being critical versus critical thinking.

Within the framework of skepticism, critical thinking is the process of acquiring information, then evaluating it to reach a logical conclusion or answer. Critical thinking is synonymous with informal logic. Increasingly, based on cognitive psychology research, educators believe that schools should focus more on teaching students critical thinking skills than rote memorization of facts.

Critical thinking responds to a variety of subjects, issues and purposes. It is part of a system of related modes of thought underlying fields such as science, mathematics, history, anthropology, economics, moral reasoning and philosophy. Critical thinking may be seen as having two aspects: 1) a set of cognitive skills, and 2) the ability and intellectual commitment, to use those skills to guide behavior. It may be contrasted with: a) simply acquiring and retaining information, since it involves a method by which information is processed; b) merely possessing a set of skills, rather than their on-going use, and c) the mere exercise of those skills without acceptance of the results.

Methods of critical thinking

Steps

Although no hard and fixed sequence of steps is required in critical thinking, the following is a useful sequence to follow:

  1. Itemize opinions from all relevant sides of an issue and collect arguments supporting each.
  2. Break the arguments into their constituent statements and draw out various additional implications from these statements.
  3. Examine these statements and implications for internal contradictions.
  4. Locate opposing claims between the various arguments and assign relative weights to opposing claims.
  • Increase the weighting when the claims have strong support especially distinct chains of reasoning or different sources, decrease the weighting when the claims have contradictions.
  • Adjust weighting depending on relevance of information to central issue.
  • Require sufficient support to justify any incredible claims; otherwise, ignore these claims when forming a judgment.
5. Assess the weight of the various claims.
  • Note that the opinion with the strongest supporting claims is more likely to be correct.
  • Mind maps are an effective tool for organizing and evaluating this information; in the final stages, numeric weights can be assigned to various branches of the mind map.

Of course, critical thinking doesn't assure that one will reach the correct conclusions. First, one may not have all the relevant information; indeed, important information may not be discovered (see progress) or the information may not even be knowable (see New Mysterianism). Second, one's biases may prevent effective gathering and evaluation of the available information.

Overcoming bias

To reduce one's bias, various measures can be taken during the process of critical thinking: Instead of asking "How does this contradict my beliefs?," ask: "What does this mean?"

In the earlier stages of gathering and evaluating information, one should first of all suspend judgement as one does when reading a novel or watching a movie. Ways of doing this include adopting a perceptive rather than judgmental orientation; that is, avoiding moving from perception to judgment as one applies critical thinking to an issue, or using white hat or blue hat thinking and delaying black hat thinking for later stages (see Edward De Bono's Six Thinking Hats).

Secondly, one should be aware of one's own fallibility by: a) accepting that everyone has subconscious biases and so questioning any reflexive judgments; b) adopting an egoless and, indeed, humble stance; c) recalling previous beliefs that one strongly held but, now, rejects; then, d) realizing one still has numerous blind spots.

Finally, one might use socratic method to evaluate an argument, asking open questions, such as the following:

  1. What do you mean by_______________?
  2. How did you come to that conclusion?
  3. Why do you believe that you are right?
  4. Where do you get your information?
  5. What happens if you are wrong?
  6. Can you give me two sources who disagree with you and explain why?
  7. Why is this significant?
  8. How do I know you are telling me the truth?
  9. What is an alternate explanation for this phenomenon?

Reaching a conclusion

A useful perspective in critical thinking is Occam's Razor. Also called the "principle of parsimony," Occam's razor states that one should not make more assumptions than necessary. Keep it simple. Given the nature of the process, critical thinking is never final. One arrives at a tentative conclusion, given the evidence and based on an evaluation. However, the conclusion must always be subject to further evaluation if there is new information.

Quotation

William Graham Sumner offers a useful summary of critical thinking:

  • [Critical thinking is]...the examination and test of propositions of any kind which are offered for acceptance, in order to find out whether they correspond to reality or not. The critical faculty is a product of education and training. It is a mental habit and power. It is a prime condition of human welfare that men and women should be trained in it. It is our only guarantee against delusion, deception, superstition, and misapprehension of ourselves and our earthly circumstances.
--Sumner, W. G. 1940. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. New York: Ginn and Co., pp. 632, 633.

References

  • The Critical Thinking Community
  • Paul, R., Elder, L., and Bartell T. 1997. California Teacher Preparation for Instruction in Critical Thinking: Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Foundation for Critical Thinking, Sacramento California


See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.