Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Wildlife refuges typically allow for limited drilling projects

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Argument's parent debate(s)

Supporting evidence

  • FoxNews Editorial 12/17/06, Ben Lieberman - "[Myth:] Drilling Is Incompatible With The Purpose Of National Wildlife Refuges. Drilling critics have tried to confuse wildlife refuges with national parks, wilderness areas and other more highly protected categories of federal lands. But national wildlife refuges typically allow limited mining, logging, drilling, ranching or other activities. Indeed, the statute creating ANWR contemplated future oil production on the coastal plain, subject to congressional approval. It is worth noting that another wildlife refuge in Alaska, the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, has had drilling onsite for decades. The oil production there rarely makes the news because it has not caused any problems, even though Kenai has far more wildlife than ANWR."

Counter-arguments

See also

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.