Argument: Taxing AIG bonuses does not violate contracts

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Taxing AIG bonuses does not violate contracts From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: AIG bonuses [Edit] Supporting quotations Chris Dodd said that taxing the bonuses "doesn't violate the terms of the contracts".[1] Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Taxing_AIG_bonuses_does_not_violate_contracts"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate