Personal tools

Argument: Superdelegates violate the principal of one person one vote

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Paul Rockwell. "Screw the Voters. Let Superdelegates Decide!". February 18, 2008 - "Even critics of superdelegate deals tend to underestimate the gravity of the issue. In its very essence, the superdelegate system is unconstitutional. It destroys the right of primary voters to choose their own nominee. It offends the principle of one person one vote. In three primary cases (Nixon v. Herndon, 1927, Nixon v. Condon, 1932, Smith v. Allwright, 1944) the Supreme Court affirmed that the right to vote in a primary (a right which includes the right to be counted and respected), is protected by the Constitution. Officials cannot legally circumvent the vote. These were discrimination cases, but the arguments apply directly to the superdelegate situation in the Democratic primary."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits