Personal tools

Argument: Open primaries preserve right of parties to endorse nominees

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Susan Nielsen. "Open Oregon's primaries." Oregonian. October 13, 2008: Open primaries "would preserve parties' constitutional right to designate their own nominees. Ballots would list each candidate's party affiliation, as well as any official party endorsements. Parties would retain quite a bit of flexibility: For example, they could endorse multiple candidates (or none) in a primary race, then pick one (or both) in the general."

George Skelton. "California open primaries. Give them a chance." Los Angeles Times. February 11th, 2010: "Party officials despise any form of open primary because they fear losing power, as if they've ever had much in California anyway. But party conventions still could endorse candidates."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits