Personal tools

Argument: Judges can quash irrelevant speeches from terrorists

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Steven Simon. "Why We Should Put Jihad on Trial." New York Times. November 17th, 2009: "while defendants and their lawyers can question witnesses, they cannot make speeches; judges are kings in this domain and can quash irrelevant oratory."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits