Argument: Conventional bombs would have been more moral against Japan
(Redirected from Argument: Conventional bombs would have been more moral)
- Debate: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki - con argument.
Bill Dietrich. "Pro and Con on Dropping the Bomb." Seattle Times. 1995 - "Conventional firebombing would have caused as much significant damage without making the U.S. the first nation to use nuclear weapons."