Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Carbon capture and storage requires substantial water

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Greenpeace International, an environmental non-profit organization, stated the following in a May 2008 report authored by Emily Rochon et al., titled "False Hope: Why Carbon Capture and Storage Won't Save the Climate," available at www.greenpeace.org: "CCS will also use more precious resources. Power stations with capture technology will need 90% more freshwater than those without."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.