Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: CCS distracts attention and resources from clean energy

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Greenpeace International, an environmental non-profit organization, stated the following in a May 2008 report authored by Emily Rochon et al., titled "False Hope: Why Carbon Capture and Storage Won't Save the Climate," available at www.greenpeace.org: "Spending money on CSS is diverting urgent funding away from renewable energy solutions for the climate crisis... investing in a renewable energy future would save US$180 billion annually and cut CO2 emissions in half by 2050."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.