Argument: The White House is strongly opposed to partitioning Iraq

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: The White House is strongly opposed to partitioning Iraq From Debatepedia (Redirected from Argument:The White House is strongly opposed to partitioning Iraq) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Partitioning Iraq [Edit] Supporting evidence Chicago Tribune 10/22/06 - "Washington also has increasingly been speaking out against suggestions that Iraq should be divided. 'You don't want to re-create the Balkans,' White House spokesman Tony Snow said Friday, describing talk of partition as 'a recipe for a tinderbox.'" Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_The_White_House_is_strongly_opposed_to_partitioning_Iraq"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate