Argument: Legislative processes are ineffectual in making trade agreements - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Legislative processes are ineffectual in making trade agreements From Debatepedia (Redirected from Argument:Legislative processes are ineffectual in making trade agreements) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate(s) Debate: Free trade, pro. Debate: NAFTA, pro. [Edit] NAFTA is an example where the legislative process had to be bipassed to make an agreement NAFTA "fast track" authority is necessary to bypass a non-acting congress Retrieved from "http://dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Legislative_processes_are_ineffectual_in_making_trade_agreements"

Problem with the site?

.